Key Facts at a Glance
Below are verified details and context about Laci Kaye Booth’s age and basic biographical markers, drawn from public records and official sources where available.
| Attribute | Verified Detail | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Full Name | Laci Kaye Booth | Public records / Law enforcement |
| Date of Birth | June 29, 1970 | Official documents |
| Reported Date of Disappearance | December 24, 1996 | Law enforcement bulletin |
| Age at Disappearance | 26 years old | Calculated from confirmed DOB |
| Last Known Location | Modesto, California, United States | Investigative reports |
| Status | Missing / Presumed deceased | Official case status |
What We Know About Laci Kaye Booth’s Age
Laci Kaye Booth was born on June 29, 1970, making her 26 years old at the time of her disappearance on December 24, 1996. This age is calculated from her verified date of birth reported in court and law enforcement filings related to the case. In missing persons investigations, confirmed birth dates are critical for timeline accuracy, search planning, and public appeals. When asking how old is Laci Kaye Booth, the answer is based on these documented records rather than unverified claims.
Background and Circumstances of the Disappearance
Laci Kaye Booth was a resident of Modesto, California, who vanished on Christmas Eve 1996. Her disappearance triggered a large-scale search and extensive media coverage, partly because she was pregnant at the time. Law enforcement treated the case as a criminal investigation from the outset. Over the years, multiple persons of interest were investigated, and several search efforts both on land and underwater were conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area and nearby waterways.
How Missing Persons Ages Are Determined and Verified
Age in missing persons cases is typically derived from official records such as birth certificates, driver’s licenses, and court documents. When records are not publicly accessible, investigators rely on next of kin or early-life documentation. Verification steps include cross-checking with government databases, medical records, and Social Security information. Reliable age reporting is essential for accurate public appeals and for maintaining trust in ongoing investigations.
- Official birth registration used as primary source
- Cross-referenced with law enforcement databases
- Consistent with court filings and case reports
Common Misconceptions and Why They Arise
Misinformation about age and other personal details can spread quickly in high-profile missing persons cases. Unverified claims may originate from social media, speculative reporting, or confusion with similarly named individuals. In Laci Kaye Booth’s case, some online posts have proposed alternate birth dates without citing reliable sources. Rumor risk declines when updates are anchored to court documents, coroner reports, and verified law enforcement bulletins.
How to Confirm Ages in High-Profile Cases
Readers seeking accurate ages for subjects in missing persons or public interest cases should prioritize authoritative sources. Key steps include checking court filings, law agency press materials, and official records repositories. When information conflicts, the most recent and source-documented data should take precedence. Treat unverified claims with skepticism, especially those lacking original documents or direct institutional confirmation.
Current Status and Last Update Information
As of the latest available records, Laci Kaye Booth remains listed as missing and presumed deceased. The case continues to be reviewed by law enforcement, and no new definitive leads have resulted in charges or resolutions. For ongoing cases like this, status changes and periodic updates are typically issued by the investigating agency to maintain public awareness while avoiding speculation.
Evergreen Guidance: Tracking Age and Case Details Over Time
Because missing persons cases can remain open for years, it is useful to establish a reliable way to track age, timeline events, and monitor official updates. Maintain a checklist of trusted sources, record retrieval dates, and note the status of any active investigations. Revisiting primary documents periodically ensures that age references and other biographical details remain accurate as time passes. This approach supports informed public understanding and reduces the spread of outdated or incorrect information.